Conducting a systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1036-7314(00)70624-2Get rights and content

Abstract

In response to the growing volume of health care literature and the variable quality of reported studies, systematic reviews have increasingly been used to guide health care decisions because of their rigorous summary of the research. Systematic reviews utilise planned methods of identifying, appraising, then summarising the results from individual studies.

The steps in performing a systematic review include: preparing a detailed research protocol; selecting criteria for inclusion of articles in the review; systematically searching the published and unpublished literature; determining which articles meet the predefined inclusion criteria; critically appraising the quality of the research; extracting outcome data from the research report and statistically combining data, where appropriate, in order to summarise the best available evidence on the topic of interest. These processes are documented in the systematic review report, and can be subject to peer review and critique like other research.

References (39)

  • G. Glass

    Primary, secondary and meta–analysis of research

    Educational Researcher

    (1976)
  • K. Dickersin

    Meta–analysis: state of the science

    Epidemiologic Review

    (1992)
  • National Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD...
  • D. Cook et al.

    Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions

    Annals of Internal Medicine

    (1997)
  • E. Hughes

    Systematic literature review and meta–analysis

    Seminars in Reproductive Endocrinology

    (1996)
  • D. Evans et al.

    Systematic reviews in nursing research

    Australian Nursing Journal

    (1998)
  • J. Lau et al.

    Cumulative meta–analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1992)
  • A. Pearson et al.

    Evidence Based Nursing: an examination of nursing within the international evidence based health care practice movement

    Nursing Review

    (1997)
  • P. Pearcey

    Achieving research–based nursing practice

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (1995)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas platforms: A systematic literature review of factors involved in the process

      2022, Ocean Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      Section 2 describes the research method, Section 3 presents the descriptive analysis of the data of the papers analyzed, Section 4 presents the categories descriptions and their dimensions, Section 5 discusses the results, and Section 6 presents the conclusions. The systematic literature review is a critical study of a research theme, allowing the researcher to map and evaluate the research topic, and specify the research question for a deeper understanding of the topic (González and Toledo, 2012; Jones and Evans, 2000; Tranfield et al., 2003). The research procedure was developed using the adaptation of the method proposed by (Cooper et al., 2009) and considered five steps, as shown in Fig. 1:

    • Hierarchy and medical error: Speaking up when witnessing an error

      2020, Safety Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Specifically, this review will explore evidence to answer the question: Within the medical hierarchy, what are the mechanisms influencing speaking up in the presence of witnessed ME? A systematic review was conducted to appraise and synthesise the primary research papers using a rigorous and clearly documented methodology in both the search strategy and the selection of studies, thereby minimising bias in the results conducting a systematic review (Jones and Evans, 2000). Primary research manuscripts in English and published in 2000 up to and including August 2017 were sourced using Medline, Psychinfo and Business Source Premier (last searched August 2017).

    • Systematic mapping study of API usability evaluation methods

      2019, Computer Science Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similarly, the work of Gorski and Iacono [72] does not mention how physical interface and logical interface from the adopted usability model of Winter et al. [89] will differ for an API. The systematic studies are conducted to perform a methodical assessment of a subject using some predefined plan, i.e., focusing on some particular research questions [91]. In the field of API analysis, we found systematic mapping study by Burns et al. [92].

    • Cleaner supply-chain management practices for twenty-first-century organizational competitiveness: Practice-performance framework and research propositions

      2015, International Journal of Production Economics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hence, we used “sustainable practices” while searching for IJPE articles. A systematic-review paper, more specifically, synthesizes, appraises, summarizes, and interprets based on the past 60 or more articles (Jones and Evans, 2000). A previous medical study reported a formula for sample-size calculations with examples of precision rates for different sizes (Guo et al., 2014).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text