ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND
Previous research has shown positive effects of patient activation on healthcare outcomes, but there is practically no information on the generalization of these findings for Latino patients. Little data are available on whether patient activation is associated with healthcare outcomes for Latino patients and whether activation varies by language proficiency and nativity status.
OBJECTIVE
We examined the levels of activation by characteristics of Latino patients (e.g. nativity, language, health status). We investigated whether patient activation relates to the quality of care received and enhanced doctor–patient communication for Latino patients.
DESIGN
We conducted analyses of 1,067 US born and foreign born Latinos who participated in the second wave of the PEW/RWJF Hispanic Healthcare Survey during 2008.
PARTICIPANTS
Participants were self-identified Latinos (18+) with a doctor visit, living in the contiguous United States who could be contacted by telephone.
RESULTS
US born Latinos had significantly (P < 0.001) greater patient activation scores than foreign born Latinos (75 versus 70). Latinos classified as bilingual and those reporting excellent health evidenced higher mean activation scores as compared to Spanish-speaking Latinos and those reporting fair or poor health. After adjusting for demographics, health status, other language and service use factors, patient activation was strongly associated with self-reported quality of care and better doctor–patient communication among both US and foreign born Latino respondents.
CONCLUSIONS
Interventions that augment patient activation could increase quality of care and improved patient–provider communication, potentially reducing health care disparities for Latinos.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hibbard J, Cunningham P. How Engaged are Consumers in Their Health and Health Care, and Why Does It Matter? Washington: Center for Studying Health System Change; 2008.
Clayton J, Butow P, Tattersall M, et al. Asking questions can help: Development and preliminary evaluation of a question prompt list for palliative care patients. Br J Cancer. 2003; 8911: 2069–77.
Miranda J, Cooper L. Disparities in care for depression among primary care patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 192: 120–6.
Clever SL, Ford DE, Rubenstein LV, et al. Primary care patients’ involvement in decision-making is associated with improvement in depression. Med Care. 2006; 445: 398–405.
Post DM, Cegala DJ, Miser WF. The other half of the whole: teaching patients to communicate with physicians. Fam Med. 2002; 345: 344–52.
Korsch BM, Gozzi EK, Francis V. Gaps in doctor-patient communication. 1. Doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics. 1968; 425: 855–71.
Roter D, Stewart M, Putnam S, Lipkin MJ, Stiles W, Inui T. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1997; 277: 350–6.
Beisdecker AE, Beisdecker TD. Patient information-seeking behaviors when communicating with doctors. Med Care. 1990; 28: 19–28.
Waitzkin H. Information giving in medical care. J Health Soc Behav. 1985; 262: 81–101.
Hall JA, Roter DL, Katz NR. Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med Care. 1988; 26: 657–75.
Stewart AL, Sherbourne CD, Wells KB, et al. Do depressed patients in different treatment settings have different levels of well-being and functioning? J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993; 615: 849–57.
Blanchard CG, Labrecque MS, Ruckdeschel JC, Blanchard EB. Physician behaviors, patient perceptions, and patient characteristics as predictors of satisfaction of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Cancer. 1990; 651: 186–92.
Rosenberg EE, Lussier MT, Beaudoin C. Lessons for clinicians from physician-patient communication literature. Arch Fam Med. 1997; 63: 279–83.
Epstein R, Campbell T, Cohen-Cole S, McWhinney I, Smilkstein G. Perspectives on patient-doctor communication. J Fam Pract. 1993; 37: 377–88.
Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989; 273 Supp: S110–127.
Brown B, Butow P, Dunn SM, Tattersall M. Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomized trial. Br J Cancer. 2001; 859: 1273–9.
Pibernik-Okanovic M, Prasek M, Poljicanin-Filipovic T, Pavlic-Renar I, Metelko Z. Effects of an empowerment-based psychosocial intervention on quality of life and metabolic control in type 2 diabetic patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2004; 52: 193–9.
Roter DL. Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction, and compliance. Health Educ Monogr. 1977; 54: 281–315.
Thompson SC, Nanni C, Schwankovsky L. Patient-oriented interventions to improve communication in a medical office visit. Health Psychol. 1990; 94: 390–404.
Tsay S, Hung L. Empowerment of patients with end-stage renal disease–a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2004; 411: 59–65.
Eisenthal S, Lazare A. Evaluation of the initial interview in a walk-in clinic. The patient’s perspective on a "customer approach". J Nerv Ment Dis. 1976; 1623: 169–76.
Flores G. Culture and the patient-physician relationship: achieving cultural competency in health care. J Pediatr. 2000; 1361: 14–23.
American Medical Association. Culturally Competent Healthcare for Adolescents: a Guide for Primary Care Proiders. Chicago: American Medical Association; 1994.
Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted R. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 206: 531–5.
Xu K, Borders T, Arif A. Ethnic differences in parents’ perception of participatory decision-making style of their children’s physicians. Med Care. 2004; 424: 328–35.
Hibbard J, Stockard J, Mahoney E, Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004; 394p1: 1005–26.
Cortés D, Mulvaney-Day N, Fortuna L, Reinfeld S, Alegría M. Patient–provider communication: understanding the role of patient activation for Latinos in mental health treatment. Health Educ Behav. 2008;EPub.
Current Population Survey. Annual Social and Economic (ASEC) Supplement, Conducted by the Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau; 2007.
Livingston G, Minushkin S, Cohn D. Hispanics and Health Care in the United States: Access, Information and Knowledge: PEW Hispanic Center and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2008.
Stewart A, Nápoles-Springer A, Gregorich S, Santoyo-Olsson J. Interpersonal processes of care survey: patient-reported measures for diverse groups. Health Serv Res. 2007; 423p1: 1235–56.
Stata Statistical Software Version 10.1. [computer program]. Version. College Station, TX; 2008.
Alegría M, Polo A, Gao S, et al. Evaluation of a patient activation and empowerment intervention in mental health care. Med Care. 2008; 463: 247.
Schaafsma ES, Raynor TD, de Jong-van den Berg LT. Accessing medication information by ethnic minorities: barriers and possible solutions. Pharm World Sci. 2003; 255: 185–90.
Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A, Willan A, Farrell S. Shared treatment decision making: what does it mean to physicians? J General Clinical Oncology. 2003; 21: 932–6.
Acknowledgements
This publication was made possible by the Robert Wood Johnson MD002261-02 and also supported by NIH Research Grant # 1P50 MHO 73469 funded by the National Institute of Mental Health and #P60 MD0 02261 (NCMHD) funded by the National Center for Minority Health and Health Disparities.
Conflict of Interest
Drs. Alegria and Perez, Mr. Sribney, Ms. Laderman, and Ms. Keefe report no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Patient Activation Measure (PAM)
The 13-Item PAM (Hibbard et al.26) consists of the following items:
Please let me know how much you agree or disagree with the following statements.
-
1.
When all is said and done, I am the person who is responsible for managing my health condition.
-
2.
Taking an active role in my own health care is the most important factor in determining my health and ability to function.
-
3.
I am confident that I can take actions that will help prevent or minimize some symptoms or problems associated with my health condition.
-
4.
I know what each of my prescribed medications does.
-
5.
I am confident that I can tell when I need to go get medical care and when I can handle a health problem myself.
-
6.
I am confident I can tell my health care provider concerns I have even when he or she does not ask.
-
7.
I am confident that I can follow through on medical treatments I need to do at home.
-
8.
I understand the nature and causes of my health condition(s).
-
9.
I know the different medical treatment options available for my health condition.
-
10.
I have been able to maintain the lifestyle changes for my health that I have made.
-
11.
I know how to prevent further problems with my health condition.
-
12.
I am confident I can figure out solutions when new situations or problems arise with my health condition.
-
13.
I am confident that I can maintain lifestyle changes like diet and exercise even during times of stress.
Would you say you...?
(4) Strongly agree
(3) Moderately agree
(2) Moderately disagree, or
(1) Strongly disagree
Item responses were summed to produce a raw score using the numerical values given above. Raw score statistics: minimum observed value 19; maximum observed value 52; median 46; mean 45.7; standard deviation 5.3; Cronbach’s α = 0.88 (overall), 0.83 (English version), and 0.88 (Spanish version).
Doctor–Patient Communication Scale
This scale was based on the following four items from the Interpersonal Processes of Care Survey Short Form (IPC-18; UCSF, 2006):
How often did doctors or health professionals ...
a. Really find out what your concerns were
b. Clearly explain their advice and recommendations
c. Clearly explain the side effects of the medication(s)
d. Ask if you were having problems following their advice and recommendations
Would you say...?
(0) Never
(1) Rarely
(2) Sometimes
(3) Usually, or
(4) Always
The items were summed to produce the scale using the numerical values given above. Scale statistics: minimum observed value 0; maximum observed value 16; median 10; mean 10.1; standard deviation 4.4; Cronbach’s α = 0.75 (overall), 0.74 (English version), 0.76 (Spanish version).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alegría, M., Sribney, W., Perez, D. et al. The Role of Patient Activation on Patient–Provider Communication and Quality of Care for US and Foreign Born Latino Patients. J GEN INTERN MED 24 (Suppl 3), 534–541 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1074-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1074-x