Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 29, Issue 6, December 1999, Pages 577-580
Preventive Medicine

Regular Article
Systematic Differences in Validity of Self-Reported Mammography Behavior: A Problem for Intergroup Comparisons?

https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1999.0575Get rights and content

Abstract

Background. Prior studies of recall accuracy for screening mammogram behavior have examined relatively homogeneous groups. Data are limited on possible systematic group differences, so we evaluated women's recall accuracy in two separate care systems in one city.

Methods. Women 50 to 70 years old with and without screening mammograms 10 to 14 months prior were identified from fiscal, clinic, and radiology records at a military care system (MCS) and a county-funded system (CFS) for indigents. Mammogram status was verified through radiology records. Women were excluded if mammograms were diagnostic, done for other than annual screening, or had abnormal results. Interview ers blinded to mammogram status surveyed randomly selected eligible women.

Results. For 62 screened/31 unscreened MCS women and 78 screened/61 unscreened CFS women, specificity was similar, at 65 and 62%, respectively. In contrast, sensitivity varied significantly: 95% versus 79% (P = 0.011). Primary ethonocultural groups were Euro-American (MCS—60%) and Mexican American (CFS—85%). Although not different in specificity of recall (67% versus 61%), these major subgroups significantly differed in sensitivity (97% versus 80%, P = 0.017), proportion of true negatives due to never having a mammogram (35% versus 57%, P = 0.003), and proportion with ≥high school education (78% versus 19%, P < 0.00001).

Conclusion. Systematic differences in recall validity may exist and compromise the accuracy of intergroup comparisons.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (32)

  • Race and the validity of self-reported cancer screening behaviors: Development of a conceptual model

    2009, Preventive Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    One problem was that we were unable to examine the extent to which factors associated with race/ethnicity (e.g., health literacy, education, English-language proficiency) contributed to differences in the validity. It is likely that there may be fewer racial/ethnic differences in studies in which all ethnic/racial groups were similarly disadvantaged (McPhee et al., 2002) compared to studies in which the minority groups were more disadvantaged than the white groups (e.g., Lawrence et al., 1999). There is evidence that, for certain ethnic minority groups, relatively more errors may occur during comprehension/interpretation, memory retrieval, and judgment formation.

  • Validity of self-reported mammography in a multicultural population in Israel

    2008, Preventive Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    In general, women were accurate in reporting whether or not they had a mammogram, but they often underestimated the time since their last mammogram (Zapka et al., 1996; Etzi et al., 1994; Paskett et al., 1996). Valid reporting of mammography has been shown in some studies to be associated with age, ethnicity, education, employment, family history of breast cancer and history of mammography performance (Hiatt et al., 1995; Suarez et al., 1995; Zapka et al., 1996; Warnecke et al., 1997; Lawrence et al., 1999; Caplan et al., 2003a,b). However, other studies have not found these associations (Suarez et al., 1995; Zapka et al., 1996; Caplan et al., 2003a).

  • Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: A meta-analytic review

    2007, Preventive Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Studies found that over 90% of women accurately reported their mammography screening in the past 12 months as validated by medical records (Barratt et al., 2000; King et al., 1990). However, this consistency is less evident in older age groups, low-income households, different ethnicities, or participants with co-morbid conditions (Bancej et al., 2004; Champion et al., 1998; Lawrence et al., 1999). Conversely, medical records may not be up-to-date, making this measure less accurate (Jibaja-Weiss et al., 2003).

View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by San Antonio Cancer Institute, National Cancer Institute P30CA54174, and Developmental Research Funds of the San Antonio Breast Cancer SPORE, National Cancer Institute P50CA58183.

View full text