Table 3

Reported psychosocial results from included studies

First author
year
Outcome (n)BeforeAfterEffect directionQuality assessment
Elston
201940
Well-being Star (n=82)30.6 (12.6)43.9 (13.3)▲*Good
WEMWBS (n=86)38.8 (10.3)46.7 (10.9)▲*
Giebel
202041
SWEMWBS (n=15)24.8 (4.6)27 (4.4)▲*Fair
Kim
202143
GDS-K (n=10)13.60 (5.0)10.00 (3.7)*Fair
Social Participation Scale (n=10)29.90 (5.7)35.10 (3.3)▲*
Self-Efficacy Scale (n=10)23.40 (4.8)27.00 (6.3)
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (n=10)31.80 (4.2)38.40 (6.3)▲*
UCLA Loneliness Scale (n=10)25.60 (2.5)22.20 (5.0)
Thomson
201845
MWM-OA (n=115)
Combined means for six subscales†
20.17 (2.74)24.98 (2.54)▲*Fair
22.66 (2.66)26.27 (1.80)
23.14 (2.59)26.64 (1.80)
Vogelpoel
201446
WEMWBS (n=8)41 (NR)47 (NR)▲ (NR)Poor
  • We provide mean (SD) (when reported) and a symbol ( or ▼) to represent the effect direction, for example, up arrow represents a positive finding. We also include the assessment of study quality based on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tool for Before–After (Pre–Post) Studies With No Control Group38.

  • *Statistically significant finding.

  • †Data combined from mean (SD) of the subscales via adding means and the square root of the total Dvariances.

  • GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale; MWM-OA, Museum Wellbeing Measure for Older Adults; NR, not reported; SWEMWBS, Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale; WEMWBS, Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Health and Well-being Scale.