Discussion
Salmonellosis of Texas in 2017 showed disparities in regional clustering of cases, public health regions and SES indicators at the county area level. Optimised hot spot and global Moran’s index method identified 21 counties in the north-central part of Texas with a high IR. The higher incidence of cases in the central part of Texas can be attributed to differences in the availability of local health departments and SES indicators. The central Texas (Public Health Regions 1 and 2/3) presented high disease clusters (statistically significant hot spots, figure 2A). Although no statistical significance, a gap of 12% in the presence of local health departments between cold and hot spot regions is meaningful. Expansion of health services and expenditure may reduce Salmonella incidence.17 18 In bivariate analyses, there was a statistically significant differences between seven SES indicators in the hot and cold spot counties. Based on this study, a combination of four SES indicators of ‘severe housing problem’ (%), social association rate, college education (%) and ‘low access to store’ in non-Hispanic Asian seniors (%) could explain the variability in the occurrence of salmonellosis in Texas.
At county-level GIS analysis, this study is the first one to demonstrate hot spot and SES association regarding salmonellosis (broad, not species specific). Previous studies had attempted a similar effort to analyse SES at different area-based levels; GIS analysis at the census tract-level showed the association of age and high SES in certain Salmonella species.13 The block-level analysis had demonstrated the association of decreasing years of education with a decrease in Salmonella infection.12 Both these studies showed a general trend without hot spot analysis. Although the current study did not analyse various serotypes, it is unclear why specific serotypes affect high SES. Varga et al found S. enteritidis area-level hot spot clustering with SES indicators (income, visible minority, number of children/family).11 The hot spot analysis method differed between the current study and Vargas et al. Understanding these differences includes the interplay of physical, biological, behavioural, cultural, health services utilisation, SES and environmental factors. The current study results were consistent with some of the results from these studies. However, they could expand on analysing various county-level serotypes in the future.
A higher percentage of a college education was associated with high clusters of salmonellosis in this study. Most, but not all, studies have shown associations between high educational attainment and infection.12 14 19 It is postulated that higher education increases awareness of food safety labels.20 By contrast, the decreased incidence was reported in low SES (low education and income) due to better hand hygiene practices, less risky food and better food storage.21–23 Other explanations for higher education and infection associations are greater access to healthcare, health-seeking behaviour, pet ownership and eating fresh produce, raw or uncooked food.24 25 Unemployment has a protective effect on salmonellosis. This factor by itself or concurrent with a lower education level can explain this observation. An Italian study by Borgnolo et al found higher non-typhi Salmonella infection rates in children whose fathers were either unemployed or working in non-blue-collar jobs.26 Thus, SES indicators, economic status (income) and higher educational attainment are intertwined, manifest a differential effect of SES in salmonellosis. By contrast, this study did not show a salmonellosis association with median household income consistent with previous research.19 Hence, the current study underscores the several explanations that interplay between education and economic status.
In a study by Lay et al27 African Americans had a higher incidence of salmonellosis, whereas this study found a higher percentage of African Americans in non-hot spot counties. In Younus et al,12 they found no association with ethnicity and salmonellosis, but our study found that the Hispanics were higher in hot spot counties, consistent with Arshad et al.28 Ethnicity may be a function of individual risk factors and pathogen-specific (ecological effect of serotypes and SES).13 Although disparities exist, it is an unclear association between foodborne pathogens and ethnicities.29 The disparity in salmonellosis among ethnicities can arise from gentrification and housing segregation. Thus, exposing the population segment to any number of high-risk SES indicators noted in this study. Although the Hispanic ethnicity emerged significant, demographic factors, behavioural or cultural, and other individual risk factors may affect these associations.
The other highlight of this study was that the full-service restaurant utilisation among seniors in the county was associated with salmonellosis (seniors are a known, high-risk age group). Darcey and Quinlan and Signs et al have found differences in SES with health code violations and food safety in retails, respectively.30 31 Appling et al reported the risk of Salmonella infection and violations in the restaurant.32 Although the differences between hot–cold counties on restaurant use in this study were small but statistically significant, further studies can strengthen this study’s findings. Furthermore, low SES communities are more likely to visit fast-food restaurants.33 34 Fast-food and full-service restaurant availability and expenditures can be associated with economic disadvantages such as poverty, unemployment or low educational attainment. Thus, despite food safety measures by agencies and food education, SES indicators are the significant determinants for salmonellosis. The ‘low access to stores for seniors’ had divergent results for Hispanic compared with non-Hispanic. There may be a bias due to a higher percentage of Hispanics in the hotspot counties.
The ‘social association rate’ is a powerful predictor of health status (positive perception and health behaviour).35 Although the ‘social association’ is a ‘rate,’ limited by self-reporting of local entities, it measures vital health-related memberships, such as fitness centres, sports organisations, religious organisations, civic and business organisations.36 In addition, social networking and community improvement (social capital) support the belief that if individuals are not isolated and have strong social networks, they make healthy choices.
Based on this study, ‘severe housing problem’ (a measurement of the percentage of lack of kitchen or plumbing facilities, overcrowding and severely cost-burdened) demonstrated substantial influence in salmonellosis. It is the only indicator that predicted the ‘zero’ occurrence of salmonellosis infection. Although it appears protective, it underscores the magnitude and strength of adverse societal problems.37 ‘Severe housing problem’ also reflects reduced food access, poverty, positive food storage and likely under-reporting and less access to healthcare.10 17 38 Adequate housing (a proxy of high SES) prevents harmful exposures and provides a sense of safety, contributing to health. The current study supports allocating resources and services to home environment assessments, indoor pest management, grants for community development, housing and inclusionary zoning and housing policies.39 With growing awareness of geomedicine in primary practice, physicians can expand on the knowledge of where the patients live. Therefore, one may explore their location-based access to local health resources and social, economic and environmental conditions.
SES is challenging as it lacks a single metric and SES index. Also, measurements vary among studies for a single variable. However, Jouve et al had described the inherent issue of a complex interaction between SES and the outcome of interest, a function of differential exposure and differential vulnerability.40 The analysis of Salmonella as a homogenous group may underestimate the association between various serotypes and SES. Under-reporting (decreased case ascertainment) due to passive surveillance of salmonellosis reduces the true incidence. Hence, the established associations will need cautious interpretation. Finally, ecological analyses do not assess confounding, and ‘ecological fallacy’ is inevitable. Although multiple regression addresses confounders, the final model is susceptible to mis-specification. The study’s strength includes group-level analysis accounting for both individual-level and community-level SES, rigorous hot spot analysis, no missing data and modelling at the local and global levels of SES. Data included in the county-level analysis can miss individual-level variation, whereas it provide information for directing policy and resources to the community.