Discussion
In the current study, high RBS had a strong association with oral cancer and breast cancer. High BP had a strong association with breast cancer. A strong inverse association was found between oral cancer and overweight/obesity.
The prevalence of high BP in our study population was 27.02%, which was consistent with the fourth District Level Household Survey, which reported HT in 25.3% of the study population (27.4% in men and 20% in women)11
The prevalence of high RBS in our study population was found to be 11.18%, which was a little more than the overall prevalence of diabetes (7.3%) elicited in the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)–India Diabetes (INDIAB) study conducted in 15 states in India.12 The difference in the prevalence in the two studies may be due to a difference in the methodology. In the INDIAB study, fasting RBS followed by the oral glucose tolerance test was done, whereas in our study, only a single RBS value was considered.
The prevalence of overweight/obesity among our study population was 40.9%. In the ICMR–INDIAB study, the prevalence of obesity was found to be varied across different parts of India. The prevalence of generalised obesity was seen to range from 11.8% in Jharkhand to 31.3% in Chandigarh, which is located in Northern India.13 The higher prevalence in our study population may be due to the higher number of female participants. Many studies have shown that obesity was more among women as compared with men.14 15
Type 2 DM and obesity have been known risk factors for many cancers.16 17 The proposed mechanisms by which type 2 DM and obesity promote cancer development are hyperglycaemia, insulin resistance, hyperinsulinaemia, increased insulin-like growth factor levels, dyslipidaemia, inflammatory cytokines, increased leptin and decreased adiponectin.18
Breast cancer was the most common cancer among the study population, with a peak in the 40–49 years age group. Data from the population-based cancer registries (PBCRs) in India have also noted a peak in breast cancer between 45 and 49 years.19
A peak of oral cancer was seen in the 40–49 years age group in our study. However, the highest incidence rates of oral cancer in PBCRs in Northern India has been found in 60–69 years.20 The PBCR was based in Delhi and Punjab, and our data pertain to Noida, Uttar Pradesh. The variation between the two may be due to the regional variations in tobacco use. Delhi and Punjab have a lower prevalence of tobacco use, whereas a higher prevalence of tobacco use was seen in Uttar Pradesh as seen in Global Adults Tobacco Survey 2016–2017.21 As the present data are from a screening clinic where early detection of cancers and precancers is the main goal, the earlier presentation of oral cancers was seen in our study. A decreasing age of initiation of tobacco use may also be one of the reasons for presentation of oral cancer in the younger age group.
The highest prevalence of OPMDs was found among the 30–50 years age group. Leukoplakia, which is one of the common OPMDs, occurs in individuals aged 35–45 years.22 A hospital-based study in India found OPMDs to occur more commonly among individuals aged 21–30 years.23
Cervical cancer was found to be highest among the 51 years and above age group. This was also seen in the data gathered under the National Cancer Registry programme.24
High BP was found to be a strong determinant with an OR of 2.66 for developing breast cancer. A meta-analysis has demonstrated that women with HT have a relative risk (RR) of 1.15 to develop breast cancer as compared with other women with normal BP.25 The meta-analysis also showed that the positive association between breast cancer and HT was present for postmenopausal women, which was also seen among our study participants.
Overweight and obesity were not found to be significant risk factors for breast cancer, and this association was absent even on subgroup analyses based on menopausal status. However, dose–response meta-analyses of BMI and breast cancer risk showed that a higher BMI increased breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women, whereas a higher BMI could decrease breast cancer risk in premenopausal women.26
In this study, high RBS was associated with breast cancer (OR=1.95). A meta-analysis showed an increased risk of breast cancer in women with DM with an OR of 1.22.27 Another systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the overall HR for breast cancer incidence was 1.23 in patients with DM as compared with those without DM.28
A high RBS was also found to be a strong risk factor for oral cancer. A meta-analysis shows that individuals with type 2 DM have an RR of 1.15 to develop oral cancer in comparison with non-diabetic individuals.29 Our study also showed a positive association between type 2 DM and oral precancerous lesions (RR=1.85)
An inverse association was seen between overweight/obesity and oral cancer. This effect was seen among current tobacco users but was absent in participants who quit smoking or never smoked before. A population-based cohort study from the UK showed that underweight was associated with increased risk of oral cavity cancers, and this risk was driven by current smokers and past smokers.30 Other studies have also shown similar results.31 32 The differences in metabolic rates and different dietary patterns among smokers have been accepted as the mechanisms for this inverse relation between BMI and smoking.31 Current tobacco use was strongly associated with oral cancer (OR=6.51) and OPMD (OR=9.82) in our study. It is also supported by evidence from other studies.33–36
In the current study, no association was seen between cervical cancer and precancer and the risk factors under study. Conflicting evidence is present in the literature regarding the association of cervical cancer with the metabolic risk factors. Supportive evidence includes the ME-Can cohort study, which showed that elevated BMI, BP and triglyceride levels were associated with an increased risk of cervical cancer besides high glucose, which was a risk factor among women 70 years old and above37; a meta-analysis found a modest positive association of BMI with cervical cancer30; a prospective study from China found that there was an increased risk of persistent HPV infection and an increased risk of incident HPV infection among obese women; however, no association was found with hyperglycaemia or HT.38 Negative pieces of evidence are an observational prospective cohort study from China found significant decreased standardised incidence ratios for cervical cancer among patients with type 2 DM,39 and a prospective cohort study from Taiwan failed to show an increased risk of cervical cancer among hypertensive individuals.40
Strength and limitations of study
In the current study, data have been gathered from a large sample of population from a screening clinic. Because there are very few studies in literature from the India and Asia Pacific region on the topic, this study fulfilled the blank gap in this field and provided valuable evidence. The main limitations of this study are (1) the number of cancer and precancer participants were less; therefore all the associations with metabolic risk factors may not be evident; (2) the study population may not be representative of the true population as selection bias cannot be ruled out; (3) hyperlipidaemia is one of the NCD metabolic risk factors that was not included in the current study; and (4) few cases of breast cancer among women may not have been detected because CBE was a basic screening tool and its sensitivity is limited.